Is social media a waste of time, effort and money for marketers? Well Mark Ritson says yes, yes and yes. He believes that marketers who rely on social media advertising are “poorly trained idiots” and the traditional forms of marketing avenues such as tv adverts, newspapers and billboards are the path to go down for a successful result. Ritson argues that social media is meant for human-to-human interactions and the traditional media outlets should be for businesses to promote themselves.
I agree to Ritson to an extent; my parents are the money spenders in our family they are the ones who will get the new car, new insurance and new air-conditioning unit. I will only buy the small family necessities such as clothes and shopping occasionally, my point being they do not use social media and there is no point advertising to me about this stuff and would be more effective advertising on television or even the radio.

Mark Ritson states that the traditional medias are still the top dogs with 66% of Australians not following a single brand on social media. However, I believe these statistics will continue to change in the future as social media becomes more and more prevalent and traditional media outlets less; so, investing early into your social media campaigns may be a intelligent idea. The change from old to new is inevitable and hedging your bets by investing in both traditional and social media is the ideal scenario.
In conclusion in my opinion, it completely depends on what you are selling to decipher whether social media advertising or the classic forms of advertising would most benefit your business. Rule out neither as traditional media is still performing to a higher viewership level, the changeover into social media overtaking the viewership numbers is bound to happen and will continue to shoot ahead as radios newspapers and free-to-air television will phase out in time.




Wow tim love the blog post this week! I guess theres a real need to have a healthy mix of…